Youth At the United Nations
The United Nations Headquarters in New York is a place of continuous activity and debate. Although a lot of the attention of the international community focuses on the annual commissions and other high-profile meetings, there are briefings, debates and events every day that contribute to the development debate and help determine the way forward for the UN.

The staff and interns at the Global Youth Action Network regularly attend these events to keep up to date on what's going on and to encourage more youth participation. This blog will be updated frequently, so check back often.

Do you enjoy writing? Do you keep up to date about the critical issues affecting youth around the world? If so, consider applying to become a volunteer blogger for GYAN. Click here for more information and for application guidelines.

Please note: The opinions expressed in this blog are the contributors' opinions and does not necessarily reflect the views of the Global Youth Action Network.

« previous 5

marioliva   marioliva marioliva's TIGblog
marioliva's profile

Group session with Latin America NGOs with ECLAC in the way COP16

From October 29to30th, the session hosted by ECLAC and the Mexican government through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs with some of the most important Latin American organizations with previous work on Climate Change.

The main objective of the session was to know the concerns of the south NGOs about the general dialogue lines to be presented in the next COP16 and how the Secretariat and the Mexican government can deal or involve it in the official processes.

In the first session only we, the Latin NGOs, talk about the risks about the main climate regional issues related with local necessities; the vulnerable groups, REDD+ and the AOSIS proposal about the “1.5 review”.

About the vulnerable groups, the GYAN contribution was to include youth as special agents of rights in the same floor with the native people and the women.

With REDD+ our proposal was the review of the positive incentives, the monitoring process. The discussion about themes like historic debt or national indicators was not easy deal but the themes are still on table.

Finally, the positions about AOSIS were divided. For some, the “1.5 review” is the proposal that the Latin NGOs should support but for others, the Cochabamba proposal to demand the “1 grade” is the most appropriated.

The second day session was a Plenary with the ECLAC ministry Alicia Bárcenas, the ministry of Foreign Affairs from Mexico Patricia Espinosa and the UNFCCC Secretariat Horacio Peluffo and all the NGOs invited.

The discussion was related to the NGOs declaration, the presentation of the UNFCCC president and some logistic and thematic questions about COP16.

The conclusion was to involve the most vulnerable sectors in the Climate Change consequences (native people, youth and women), to review the monitoring process of REDD+ and to articulate the Cochabamba and the AOSIS proposal and to include an entire process with the participation with NGOs for the next COP17 in South Africa.

Written by: Mariana González

November 4, 2010 | 7:31 PM Comments  {num} comments


andreaprince   andreaprince Andrea Prince's TIGblog
Andrea Prince's profile

End of the Commission for Social Development

As the Commission for Social Development has come to a close, I wanted to post an update on the progress of youth in the decision of social inclusion. On the agenda of this year’s meeting was a whole item dedicated to the World Programme of Action for Youth. European youth delegates have been very active in the commission by making statements and there is also a resolution regarding youth specifically. The two topics brought up most often were climate change and employment for young people. The need for youth to be employed is one area both our members and Member States at the commission can agree upon. At a morning briefing with the Chairperson of the Commission, Finnish Ambassador Ms. Kirsti Lintonen, she highlighted that next year (the policy year where resolutions will be made) youth employment will, in fact, be a major concern.

These are great steps to have taken, but as always, I have to temper the successes with saying that it cannot end now. Governments need to be followed up with on the statements they have made and commitments to youth they have promised. I also believe that there needs to be more youth participation in social development. I suggest more organized groups of young people from developing countries, where the majority of young people live, must be included in discussions. However, I do not have solutions to how to actually make this happen. We need to think and act together.

All I can do is leave you with some questions for thought:

What would these groups look like?
How feasible is it for young people to be physically present to conferences?
What other alternatives could be thought of to insure ALL young people have their voices heard?

February 16, 2009 | 10:02 PM Comments  {num} comments


andreaprince   andreaprince Andrea Prince's TIGblog
Andrea Prince's profile

Social Inclusion?

The Commission for Social Development is a more than half way through. I just wanted to provide a summary of what has been happening through out the week. Let me try to set the scene for you...

Location: UN conference room
I am not sure how many people have seen movies such as "The Interpreter", but they give a fairly accurate depiction of what the inside of a UN conference room looks like. Although, I think what happens inside is a little less exciting than the movie.

Mood: Bureaucratically stifled
Some delegates look bored. Others appear to be making plans for the weekend. Either way, delegates are saying what has been pre-approved by their governments with no diversion.

Time: Somewhere between 10AM and 12:30PM

I have been sitting and listening to delegate after delegate (country after country) present their statements. Generally, they all begin with “Congratulations Madam Chairperson and the honorable Bureau for your election into the position…” and to summarize the rest would basically sound something like “we fully support social inclusion and are doing are promoting it in all our practices”. I know, it is a glib observation and not fully accurate. There are different issues that some countries focus on more, and countries are saying important things. Take a look at the statements submitted on the CSocD website to check them all out.

But all this congratulating and speaking about how much countries are already promoting inclusion gets a little old, and frankly, more than a little untruthful. That is why it was so refreshing to hear Cuba give her stance and liven up the conference a little. Cuba asked:

How can we build more just societies where all persons have equal opportunities, including economic opportunities, and where inequality and exclusion are eradicated, while selfishness, injustice, hegemonic pretensions, inequity, wastefulness, and excessive consumerism of a few, that is, those who have more, continue to prevail and grow stronger at the international level?

“Right on Cuba!” was what I was thinking…until at the end they added in that “Cuba is proud to have a profoundly popular and participatory democracy, where the people has the power and all human rights, not a few, are promoted and protected”. Ehn, nice try…

The United States was no better, though. They basically dropped names like “Obama”, “Hillary”, and “Gore”. Did we forget about the last eight years’ administration? I feel it is so important for these talks to be honest. Why can’t countries talk and say, “Hey, I know we haven’t always been perfect in this area but what can we do to change that?” Not, “Listen to all the great things we have done”. That, in itself, is exclusionary. You are excluding and ignoring groups of people who have not felt the benefits of your programs and policies. Having these conversations are important, and countries have to be responsible to the statements they make. How and when can we young people hold those accountable and no longer let them get away with their sweeping statements?

February 10, 2009 | 11:02 PM Comments  {num} comments


andreaprince   andreaprince Andrea Prince's TIGblog
Andrea Prince's profile

Preparing for the Commission for Social Development

Greetings! This past week has been an exciting one here in the United States, and elsewhere in the world, with the inauguration of new president Barack Obama. Clearly, so many of us are hungry for change and belief that things can get better. I believe why so many of us in the United States believe that President Obama can help usher in these changes is because he brings people together, makes everyone feel included. This allows people to become inspired to act together. While this has been something highlighted by the US media lately, this is not a new phenomenon. People have been coming together to work on common issues for a long time. This past week I have been thinking a lot about how people can come together as I have been preparing for the upcoming Commission for Social Development meeting at the United Nations (UN).

For those of you who are not familiar Commission for Social Development, it is a conference held every year for two weeks at the UN. This year is the 47th meeting and will take place February 4-13. The commission has 43 member states (countries) involved and usually somewhere between 150-200 civil society organizations (groups of regular people like you and I). This year the topic will be “Social Integration” and discussing how nations can build socially inclusive “societies for all”. In non-UN language, this means countries will work to come up with written agreements to follow that allow everyone—regardless of ethnicity, nationality, gender, religion, age, etc, etc.—to feel accepted and respected by their countries.

My work the past four months has been preparing a statement that puts together all the ideas and recommendations GYAN members contributed during our online consultation regarding social integration, or how we have been referring to it—social inclusion. I have enjoyed reading all the amazing points and views GYAN members take, and from that, being able to translate all those into one cohesive statement. Our statement is now posted on the Commission website as an official UN document in six different languages, along with other statements from more organizations all working towards the same goal of social inclusion. It is so exciting to know that youth voices—YOUR VOICES—are going to be heard by the member states in attendance!

Getting young people involved in the discussions is so important, but the work does not end here! The information has to be shared with our communities. More importantly, we must remind our governments of the promises they have made and demand that they abide by them. It is such a big job and cannot be done alone. If you are unfamiliar with the Commission for Social Development and the online consultation GYAN held, I invite you to take a look sites and see what young people are saying. GYAN members have shared their recommendations on how their governments can promote social inclusion, how do you think your government can do this? Or even, what is social inclusion?

January 23, 2009 | 2:37 PM Comments  {num} comments

ekehaug   ekehaug Vidar Ekehaug's TIGblog
Vidar Ekehaug's profile

Are the MDGs the right framework for development?

This entry was written by Franziska Seel and Vidar Ekehaug as the introduction to the September edition of YouthLink Express - GYAN's monthly newsletter. Click here to subscribe.

Last week saw the opening of the General Assembly at the United Nations Headquarters here in New York, the time of the year when world leaders speak about their commitments to development, peace and security. At the center of many statements were the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). The MDGs came out of the Millennium Summit in 2000, and represented a major shift in commitments from governments. For the first time in history, governments recognized that there are enough resources to end poverty, provide education and health care for all, achieve gender equality, and ensure a sustainable development. Also for the first time, there was an actual deadline – 2015 – for making significant progress.

Yet, today, we are far away from reaching the MDGs. What is going wrong? Are the MDGs after all just an unrealistic dream? While governments continue to repeat their commitments to the goals as they have done the last few years, there also seems to be a growing sense of helplessness among many of them. Civil society leaders, on their part, are increasingly concerned that the strategies to achieve the MDGs focus too much on economic growth as a catalyst for development, and ignore the human aspect. The MDGs represent a tangible and deliverable commitment from governments to create a better world, but they are also just a series of numbers, targets and indicators.

The MDGs can be a strong advocacy tool to hold governments accountable, but is the MDG policy framework enough to eradicate extreme poverty and growing inequality? Or do we need to change the whole debate? Please share your opinions with us!

September 30, 2008 | 3:58 PM Comments  {num} comments

« previous 5

This Group TIGBlog is owned by: Marioliva González.

Akhila Kolisetty
akinyemi ayo
Andrea Prince
Appolinaire ZAGABE
Bridget Kearney
Candice Valente
Christine Seifert
Elisabeth Szerencsics
farhan mohamed
George Ndungu
Gillian Javetski
Global Youth Action Network
gyanendra raj ojha
kamanga wanjiku
Muhhammad Umar Khaiyam Bin Alam
Neha Kohli
Nthembe Kenisha Ngalande
Paulo Farine
rex uzonna ukaejiofo
Saket Mani
Vidar Ekehaug
Yuchen Chen

You must be logged in to join this group TIGblog.

Latest Posts
Group session with...
End of the Commission...
Social Inclusion?
Preparing for the...
Are the MDGs the right...

Monthly Archive
November 2006
September 2007
October 2007
February 2008
June 2008
July 2008
September 2008
January 2009
February 2009
November 2010

Change Language

Important Disclaimer